|

|
|
Hearing John Cage: An Approach
to Introducing Ambient Music
by Brian Current, Music
John Cage (1912-1992) presents
an attractive challenge to a music GSI teaching a class of non-majors.
As much an idea man as a pen-on-paper composer, Cage proposed through
his writings and artistic approach that all sound, whether deliberate
or accidental, whether inside or outside of the concert hall, is in fact
a macro-series of musical events. In effect, according to this way of
thinking, all ambient sound is music. Considering the way most of us have
been brought up to think about music, this is a significant imaginative
leap as well as an important door to open for those who might not come
across the idea elsewhere.
It began on a whim during one
particular session: while the students were busily at work on an unrelated
quiz, I took dictation from the auditory environment in the classroom.
That is, I wrote down (as one might write down music) the inadvertent
sounds made by the students as they wrote the test. This is a sound world
familiar to all teachers: the students, suddenly resolute, are anxiously
scribbling away and producing involuntary sounds: sighs, grunts, low moans,
inhalations, ruffling, pencil-clicks and chair-squeaks. Incorporating
the low hum of the ventilation system, I compiled the sounds into a neat
musical score by drawing the sounds as they occurred over a twenty-second
time span. I then titled my piece "Twenty Seconds of Music 20A Taking
a Quiz."
The following week, at a strategic
point in a discussion on Cage's works and ideas, we listened as a class
to the ambient sounds surrounding us in the room. As always, the variety
and richness of these sounds was surprising. I asked them: "Is this
music?" Most said no. I then handed out photocopies of my score discussed
above and posed my question again. At this point, there was some discussion:
now that there was musical intent in my creating a piece, about one third
of the room felt that these sounds were in fact "music". Finally,
we recreated the ambient sounds I recorded by "performing" the
piece as a class. Dividing the parts up as one would for a choir, we assigned
some students as the "chair-squeakers", some as the "sighers",
some as the "inhalers", and one (who had been the student who
had clicked his mechanical pencil during the actual dictation) as the
"pencil-clicker". With myself as conductor, we proceeded to
perform our twenty seconds of music, producing a sound world not unlike
that which I had heard the week before. Posing the question again: "Is
this music?", I was surprised to find that two thirds of the class
now believed these sounds to be a musical composition, mostly due to the
fact that we were creating them deliberately. An interesting discussion
then followed concerning the role of intention in art, and the fact that
we changed our minds over the course of the class regarding material that
was essentially the same throughout.
The results of our discussion
returned to me in the form of an assignment handed in two weeks after
our session. Their instructions were to find somewhere outdoors with interesting
ambient sound, to notate and describe these sounds as accurately as possible
and to ask themselves in an brief essay whether or not they felt that
these sounds were music and why. The papers were unexpectedly creative,
ranging from graphic scores of sounds found on hiking trails to vivid
descriptions of sounds occurring within a freeway tunnel at rush hour.
One student fastened a tape recorder to the bottom of her Volkswagen and
drove down Telegraph. Many thought that their discovered soundscapes were
true musical compositions while others adamantly did not. However, nearly
all advanced the idea that they now held a new awareness towards the ambient
sound that is always around us, and would be a more attentive audience
towards this music in the future.
|