|

|
|
Engaging with Primary Sources
and Making Connections to Readings and Lectures
by Tania Martin, Architecture
When I was hired as a GSI for
The American Forest: Its Ecology, History, and Representation the second
semester it had ever been offered, I was given a challenge: to devise
teaching strategies that would equip students with the skills needed to
interpret primary sources. The analysis of primary sources was a requisite
component of the term project, a task, I was told, the previous year's
students had ill-accomplished.
I determined that students
unfamiliar with primary source research need models for conducting such
research and hands-on practice. This became clear from my students' paper
abstracts, preliminary object analysis exercises, and from class discussions.
It was not enough to lecture about paintings, photographs, buildings,
and forests - the students needed to engage with the materials themselves,
and to learn to read various kinds of sources against one another.
Working under the assumption
that students really do learn better if they can make discoveries for
themselves, I took my students to the Bancroft Library. There, we examined
a selection of primary sources relevant to redwood forests, Yosemite,
and logging that I had identified and organized with a librarian to be
displayed. The items, arranged into three thematic groups, included geological
surveys, stereoscopic views of Yosemite, an artist's sketchbook, an advertisement,
lumber company promotional photographs, a Sierra Club ledger, diary, and
personal letters about shipping lumber. After giving the students a chance
to look closely at the materials, I questioned them, guiding their engagement
with the material, e.g. about how the intended use of these images, and
other documents, affected their appearance, format, medium, style, and
composition. I asked them to find common denominators in the group of
items. What title would they give that group? What incongruities did they
see? I also asked them to formulate an argument or thesis that explained
the objects in this group. How would they use two or three of the images,
texts, documents in this group as evidence to support a thesis? I hoped
that by the end of section the students would start not only to see the
ways that Yosemite (and other California forests) was more than a tourist
site (rather, it was a refuge for a commune, a site of the logging industry
as well as a cradle for conservation efforts, and that it had ties to
the larger economy and national American identity) but also that they
would have an opportunity to practice constructing an argument that stemmed
from the interpretation of primary sources.
I assessed the outcome of my
efforts in a variety of ways. I kept a teaching log. As I made my entry
for the week, I realized that although I had succeeded in introducing
my students to primary sources first-hand, that this activity remained
an isolated experience. Could the students make the connection between
the objects they had seen and the lessons taught in lecture and in their
readings? I tested this out the following section by having students identify
and explain how some of the primary sources they had seen were similar
to the evidence that a particular author used to support her argument,
and how other primary sources may have challenged the author's perspective
or argument. I also was able to determine the success of the outcome from
direct feedback from the Professors (one of whom observed me that week)
and the other GSI, and through informal discussions with the students
in office hours. For example, students made reference to the primary sources
they had seen in the Bancroft in "ah-ha" moments--you could see the light
bulb go off in their heads--during subsequent section activities and during
their field trip to Yosemite. The ultimate measure of success was registered
in the quality of the students' term papers.
|