|

|
|
The Renaissance Lyric Poem
as Pop Culture
by Kimberly Johnson, English
The teacher of Renaissance
poetry faces a double set of challenges; the first is a tendency among
students generally to be daunted by poetry, and the second (which compounds
the first) is the unfamiliarity of students with language four or five
centuries old. My students approached the readings for my course with
a combination of resentment and trepidation. The antique idiom prevented
them from confident interpretation. They were reluctant to believe that
these alien, stiff, wrought verses could be understood by a 21st-century
readership, much less that they could provoke any passion other than boredom.
In response to this problem,
I assigned each student to choose a poem from the course's syllabus and
teach it to the class. Their presentations were to have three components:
1) The student began by translating the poem into a 21st-century American
idiom, explaining the dramatic situation of the poem, its issues, its
development, and its conclusion. 2) The student presented a current lyric
text-that is, a pop song written since 1960-that revisited the same topoi
that her Renaissance poem covered. The student was required to explain
how the contemporary text mirrored the situation and agenda of the Renaissance
text, and to assess which of the two texts was the more effective piece
of communication. 3) Finally, the student returned to the Renaissance
poem and presented an interpretation of the text in its original idiom.
The most immediate evidence
that this assignment improved student analysis is that they invariably
concluded, in step 2 of the presentation, that the Renaissance poem achieved
its purposes more effectively, demonstrating a more engaged relationship
with the text. Under the umbrella of pop culture, the students were able
to approach work by Spenser and Donne as if it held currency in their
lives, and were bolstered to give scrutiny to the text's operation and
design. After the presentations were done, the students' enthusiasm for
the work grew as they realized that these foreign-sounding poems were
nothing different-nothing more terrifying-than they were accustomed to
hearing through their own headphones. The papers they turned in following
the presentations (unlike papers written earlier in the semester) reflected
a nuanced, patient, and deliberate analysis of the texts at the level
of rhetoric, where before the students seemed to have been content providing
vague summaries or repeating discussion material. The presentations fostered
a familiarity with 400-year-old texts that gave students interpretive
purchase; no longer daunted, they could devote their energies to investigation
rather than to comprehension.
|